Photo by Photo Boards on Unsplash

5G: Urgent Question To NGOs

if you are truly concerned about Climate Change? What do you think thousands of new satellites, renewed every five years, millions of new transmitters and billions of new 5G gadgets will do to our Carbon - not to mention Ecological - Footprint?

This is a letter drafted by Tanja Katarina Rebel and sent to major NGOs re urgent questions about 5G. She urges us all to write to them and do the same.

Dear Friends of the Earth, Greenpeace, CPRE, Avaaz, 38 Degrees, Sum of Us and Global Justice Now,

Once the 100,000 (!) broadband satellites approved for the lower atmosphere have all been launched, polluting our night skies and harming the Magnetosphere, Ionosphere and Ozone Layer + significantly increasing our Ecological and Carbon Footprint as well as irradiating every square inch of our Planet and once 5G has been rolled out everywhere, harming humans and wildlife – in particular bees and birds – the entire Planet will be covered by an inescapable Electrosmog blanket seriously compromising our Health and harming our Environment. On top of this, we will be locked into a Planetary Electronic Surveillance Grid which will make protesting all but fruitless and current lockdowns look like a veritable walk in the park. Kindly have a look at what is happening in China for a flavour of what is to come.

Here comes my question: Why oh why do you not speak up against this? Why do you not ask for independent Health and Environmental Impact Assessments before the roll-out of an untested Technology? Why do you not ask for the Precautionary Principle to be upheld? And why do you not defend the basic Human Right to Informed Consent, enshrined in UN Law? And if you really care about our Freedom to Protest, why do you then not oppose Digital Surveillance??


I have written to you all for over a year pleading for action. There has been precious little response from you apart from to say there are too few resources for new campaigns. Well, as several of you have started to campaign against the new Bill of Rights, there obviously are resources for new campaigns. What’s more, it does not take many resources to ask for independent Health and Environmental Impact Assessments and for the Precautionary Principle to be upheld. With regards to the recurring argument that there isn’t “enough evidence” it does not take evidence for the Precautionary Principle to be respected, the onus should be on the industry to prove that exposing humans and wildlife to ubiquitous 24/7 pulsed high-frequency radiation is safe. As yet there is not one single study to show that it is. Nor has anyone asked people whether they want to be exposed to this experimental radiation, which is blatantly in breach of our Right to Informed Consent. In fact, we are not even being properly informed.

There are already tens of thousands of independent studies showing that already existing Electrosmog is harmful to humans and wildlife, which ought to concern you.

There are already tens of thousands of independent studies showing that already existing Electrosmog is harmful to humans and wildlife, which ought to concern you. I enclose a 5G Briefing for your perusal with links to many studies. In essence, this one should suffice for you to act: https://theecologist.org/2020/apr/30/smart-techs-carbon-footprint

That is, if you are truly concerned about Climate Change? What do you think thousands of new satellites, renewed every five years, millions of new transmitters and billions of new 5G gadgets will do to our Carbon – not to mention Ecological – Footprint? Just wondering…. I look forward to your response and urgent action,
Many thanks in advance,

Yours sincerely,

Tanja Katarina Rebel

Share this post

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on pinterest
Share on print
Share on email